yeh, it is just pushing percentages of risk in various directions - you can get away with ignoring all of it if the dice roll well, you can still catch despite doing all the things (tm) if they dont.NapLajoieonSteroids wrote: ↑Fri Jun 05, 2020 8:54 am I've found it helpful to get people on board in our network by emphasizing that we are 'preparing for' and not 'protecting against' the virus. We are not avoiding it, we are practicing ways to minimize our exposures as best as we are able.
And our greatest abilities to help ourselves were tied to consistency.
-Consistency in hygiene
-Consistency in diet
-Consistency in exercise&rest
-Consistency with travel [if necessary]
-Consistency in monitoring ourselves
If people want superstitions on top of that, I have been reticent to push against it. Arguing the point that the soap they like isn't magical in the midst of thing is not productive.
=============
To that, popular science has not been helpful. All these experts&amateurs going through media outlets and throwing statistics around have not been helpful.
Maybe to the extent of getting people to be aware that something is going on; but it's very hard for some people to climb off the 'abstractions ledge'
many folks find that hard to grasp.
the 2 metre rule isnt absolute, a big sneeze indoors makes a mockery of it, yet it stops all the little day to day breath sharing, which is gross anyway and should be enforced from this day forward!