On the Nature of Things | Forum

Poll: 31% of Syrian refugees support ISIS -- and Trudeau is importing 25,000 by Christmas
Ezra LevantRebel Commander

So Justin Trudeau says he’s going to import 25,000 Syrian migrants by Christmas. Which is seven weeks away.

Put aside questions like: How will our social services handle them? How many Canadian homeless will be displaced by Syrian homeless? How many hospital beds will be reserved for them?

Here’s what I’m worried about instead:

How do you do background checks on 25,000 people, coming from a terrorist wasteland, in seven weeks?

Type their names into Google? Ask for a resume?

I'll show you a video of Syrian “moderates”, fighting against the terrorist-supporting Syrian government. They’ve put women from the Alawite ethnic minority in a cage on a pickup truck as human shields, because that’s the ethnic clan that Syrian dictator Bashar Assad is from.

Remember: These are the "moderates."

Syria is one of the most backward countries in the world. For liberals, if gay rights is your thing, you’re pretty much importing 25,000 homophobes.

Syria is also the country that was clocking 200 honour killings a year before the civil war — which has surely skyrocketed as Muslim men kill any sisters or wives who have been raped in the course of war.

What about Syrians and other refugees who've never been violent, but who, in their regular lives, hate the West, hate women, hate minorities, hate gays, hate Jews, hate liberal democracy?

Well, there's actually a recent scientific poll of Syrian refugees, carried out by the Arab Centre for Research and Public Policy Studies, headquartered in Doha, Qatar. (SCROLL DOWN to see the whole survey.)

Let me show you the bundle of joy we’re about to import by Christmas:

31% of Syrian refugees disagree with the objective of defeating the Islamic State terrorist group.

So out of 25,000 refugees, 7,500 will be ISIS lovers.

41% are Jew-hating, America-hating bigots.

97% are gay-hating, probably women-hating bigots.

Again: How do you screen them out?

If you’re Justin Trudeau, you don’t — because you don’t care, as long as they vote for you in 2019.

Nonc Hilaire wrote:Calm down, Doc. You don't usually make such awful spelling errors.

Nobody can make an accurate survey of Syrian refugees. Slow down and be analytical; not reactive.

YMix wrote:I thought all of them supported...

Doc wrote:Interesting I haven't seen anyone say that before. So why do you think they all support ISIS?

YMix wrote:

Doc wrote:Interesting I haven't seen anyone say that before. So why do you think they all support ISIS?

It's a joke. You can tell your avatar to stop staring grimly at me.

Also, Canada's ISIS has changed its name to Immigrant Services Association of Nova Scotia (ISANS).

Nonc Hilaire wrote:Calm down, Doc. You don't usually make such awful spelling errors.

Nobody can make an accurate survey of Syrian refugees. Slow down and be analytical; not reactive.

Typhoon wrote:

Nonc Hilaire wrote:Calm down, Doc. You don't usually make such awful spelling errors.

Nobody can make an accurate survey of Syrian refugees. Slow down and be analytical; not reactive.

Well, if a blogger can produce such accurate, detailed, and informed percentages so quickly,

then screening out the problematic ones will be a trivial exercise for the Canadian government.

Doc wrote:

Typhoon wrote:

Nonc Hilaire wrote:Calm down, Doc. You don't usually make such awful spelling errors.

Nobody can make an accurate survey of Syrian refugees. Slow down and be analytical; not reactive.

Well, if a blogger can produce such accurate, detailed, and informed percentages so quickly,

then screening out the problematic ones will be a trivial exercise for the Canadian government.

Like I said if you go to the link you will find the 22 pages study by the Arab Centre for Research and Public Policy Studies, headquartered in Doha, Qatar.

Do you all ever bother to read things before making comments?

Figure 11 Respondents' answers to the question "In general, do you have a positive or negative view of ISIL?"

Syrian refugees. Negative + negative to some extent: 83%

Arab Center for Research and Policy Study.

In conclusion, the Arab public opposes ISIL and supports the coalition’s stated objective of “degrade and ultimately destroy” the group. Nonetheless, the Arab public remains skeptical of the coalition’s ability to achieve that aim, and further believes that the US-led campaign against ISIL would serve the interest of a small group of global and regional powers at the expense of respondents’ home countries. The Arab public’s negative perception of the credibility of the United States, the country leading the anti-
ISIL coalition, based on American policy towards the Palestinian cause and the Syrian crisis, is reflected in widespread skepticism of the coalition’s ability to accomplish its aims.”

Typhoon wrote:

Doc wrote:

Typhoon wrote:

Nonc Hilaire wrote:Calm down, Doc. You don't usually make such awful spelling errors.

Nobody can make an accurate survey of Syrian refugees. Slow down and be analytical; not reactive.

Well, if a blogger can produce such accurate, detailed, and informed percentages so quickly,

then screening out the problematic ones will be a trivial exercise for the Canadian government.

Like I said if you go to the link you will find the 22 pages study by the Arab Centre for Research and Public Policy Studies, headquartered in Doha, Qatar.

Do you all ever bother to read things before making comments?

I do, however, that does not prevent me from mocking histrionic bloggers [such as Ezra Levant].

While it has been used as excuse to completely evade the point to this point

Figure 11 Respondents' answers to the question "In general, do you have a positive or negative view of ISIL?"

Syrian refugees. Negative + negative to some extent: 83%

A bit higher than the approval rating of the US Congress in the US [15%].

Arab Center for Research and Policy Study.

In conclusion, the Arab public opposes ISIL and supports the coalition’s stated objective of “degrade and ultimately destroy” the group. Nonetheless, the Arab public remains skeptical of the coalition’s ability to achieve that aim, and further believes that the US-led campaign against ISIL would serve the interest of a small group of global and regional powers at the expense of respondents’ home countries. The Arab public’s negative perception of the credibility of the United States, the country leading the anti-
ISIL coalition, based on American policy towards the Palestinian cause and the Syrian crisis, is reflected in widespread skepticism of the coalition’s ability to accomplish its aims.”

Of course, such a study will be studiously ignored by the coalition.

Doc wrote:

Typhoon wrote:

Doc wrote:

Typhoon wrote:

Nonc Hilaire wrote:Calm down, Doc. You don't usually make such awful spelling errors.

Nobody can make an accurate survey of Syrian refugees. Slow down and be analytical; not reactive.

Well, if a blogger can produce such accurate, detailed, and informed percentages so quickly,

then screening out the problematic ones will be a trivial exercise for the Canadian government.

Like I said if you go to the link you will find the 22 pages study by the Arab Centre for Research and Public Policy Studies, headquartered in Doha, Qatar.

Do you all ever bother to read things before making comments?

I do, however, that does not prevent me from mocking histrionic bloggers [such as Ezra Levant].

While it has been used as excuse to completely evade the point to this point

Figure 11 Respondents' answers to the question "In general, do you have a positive or negative view of ISIL?"

Syrian refugees. Negative + negative to some extent: 83%

A bit higher than the approval rating of the US Congress in the US [15%].

Arab Center for Research and Policy Study.

In conclusion, the Arab public opposes ISIL and supports the coalition’s stated objective of “degrade and ultimately destroy” the group. Nonetheless, the Arab public remains skeptical of the coalition’s ability to achieve that aim, and further believes that the US-led campaign against ISIL would serve the interest of a small group of global and regional powers at the expense of respondents’ home countries. The Arab public’s negative perception of the credibility of the United States, the country leading the anti-
ISIL coalition, based on American policy towards the Palestinian cause and the Syrian crisis, is reflected in widespread skepticism of the coalition’s ability to accomplish its aims.”

Of course, such a study will be studiously ignored by the coalition.

GIven the Refugee issue in Europe and the Paris attack I would say they already have.

Typhoon wrote:

Alexis wrote:Audio revendication of Nov. 13th Paris attacks for Islamic State has led to positive identification. This Jihadist is one of about 10 Frenchmen with important positions in I.S. structure.

His name is Fabien Clain (link in French)

Like his name suggests, he has no Muslim background. He is one of 25% to 40% of French fighting for I.S. who are converts.

Indeed, while probably no more than 100,000 of France's 5 million-odd Muslims are converts (~2%), they are a much bigger share of radicals and Jihadists.

No zealot like a converted zealot.

Typhoon wrote:

Doc wrote:

Typhoon wrote:

Doc wrote:

Typhoon wrote:

Nonc Hilaire wrote:Calm down, Doc. You don't usually make such awful spelling errors.

Nobody can make an accurate survey of Syrian refugees. Slow down and be analytical; not reactive.

Well, if a blogger can produce such accurate, detailed, and informed percentages so quickly,

then screening out the problematic ones will be a trivial exercise for the Canadian government.

Like I said if you go to the link you will find the 22 pages study by the Arab Centre for Research and Public Policy Studies, headquartered in Doha, Qatar.

Do you all ever bother to read things before making comments?

I do, however, that does not prevent me from mocking histrionic bloggers [such as Ezra Levant].

While it has been used as excuse to completely evade the point to this point

Figure 11 Respondents' answers to the question "In general, do you have a positive or negative view of ISIL?"

Syrian refugees. Negative + negative to some extent: 83%

A bit higher than the approval rating of the US Congress in the US [15%].

Arab Center for Research and Policy Study.

In conclusion, the Arab public opposes ISIL and supports the coalition’s stated objective of “degrade and ultimately destroy” the group. Nonetheless, the Arab public remains skeptical of the coalition’s ability to achieve that aim, and further believes that the US-led campaign against ISIL would serve the interest of a small group of global and regional powers at the expense of respondents’ home countries. The Arab public’s negative perception of the credibility of the United States, the country leading the anti-
ISIL coalition, based on American policy towards the Palestinian cause and the Syrian crisis, is reflected in widespread skepticism of the coalition’s ability to accomplish its aims.”

Of course, such a study will be studiously ignored by the coalition.

GIven the Refugee issue in Europe and the Paris attack I would say they already have.

Indeed.

Typhoon wrote:

Alexis wrote:Audio revendication of Nov. 13th Paris attacks for Islamic State has led to positive identification. This Jihadist is one of about 10 Frenchmen with important positions in I.S. structure.

His name is Fabien Clain (link in French)

Like his name suggests, he has no Muslim background. He is one of 25% to 40% of French fighting for I.S. who are converts.

Indeed, while probably no more than 100,000 of France's 5 million-odd Muslims are converts (~2%), they are a much bigger share of radicals and Jihadists.

No zealot like a converted zealot.

Typhoon wrote:

Mr. Perfect wrote:Japan can take them.

Typhoon wrote:

Mr. Perfect wrote:Japan can take them.

Japan should take some, however, it will not do so.

On the other hand, Japanese, unlike some the in USA are not terrified of Muslims and welcomes them to visit Japan:

http://www.halalmedia.jp/

http://www.jnto.org.sg/for_muslim_visitors.html

There is a Muslim community in Japan and lots of mosques.

While Japan is appalled by the events in France, completely sympathetic to the French, and completely disgusted by ISIS

no Japanese politician of note is making histrionic anti-Muslim speeches, no Muslims [or Sikhs] are being harassed, or mosques attacked,

because, well, most Japanese are not witless f*ckwits.

Typhoon wrote:Japan should take some, however, it will not do so.

Mr. Perfect wrote:CIA world factbook says Japan is 98.5% ethnically Japanese. Is this true?

Mr. Perfect wrote:If so it's amazing that anyone from Japan would comment on immigration or multiculturalism. At all.