On the Nature of Things | Forum

Maybe we need a beauty of AI women.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=19nGPc6Ay60

Have at it.

ai generated pictures have done from amusing to annoying real damn quick for me.

I have a visceral dislike for the entire "dream nightmare" quality it all has, its just gross.

noddy wrote: ↑Sat Dec 09, 2023 8:15 am ai generated pictures have done from amusing to annoying real damn quick for me.

I have a visceral dislike for the entire "dream nightmare" quality it all has, its just gross.

I lost interest quickly as well. It’s like early Photoshop accelerated. The only way out of this is to burn through it.

So far, I've been able to differentiate between photos of real women and ML models.

The spurious digit problem seems to have been solved, but the proportions of the hands and feet still need work.

In the case of ML models, they often look too flawless and too symmetric as if they have been photoshopped to the nth degree.

I agree with Francis Bacon with regards to beauty,

There is no exquisite beauty… without some strangeness in the proportion.”

I don't think spurious digits was what he had in mind.

yes, if you cant see a spark of personality, a quirk of individuality, their is something wrong about it.

They will undoubtedly get better. I have noticed that scam email has gotten much more sophisticated in the last few months. I can still tell but it takes more time.

They will probably get more real looking than this -- Do you really want to say "no" to her?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFJVNvWbcpQ

learning to say no is a life skill best learnt early.

noddy wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 3:51 am learning to say no is a life skill best learnt early.

30 second life lesson - Substitute scenic background for beautiful AI generated Woman.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/PfoT8lPJWG8

BTW Noddy have you seen the series "Mr. Robot"?

The number of weekly views for "The Beauty of Women" thread suddenly jumped from about 30 views per week [threshold for posting a page of new images] to more than 1000 views per week. This week is not over and already there are currently about 1323 views.

Wonder if the images are being copied for generative ML.

Typhoon wrote: ↑Tue Dec 12, 2023 1:31 am The number of weekly views for "The Beauty of Women" thread suddenly jumped from about 30 views per week [threshold for posting a page of new images] to more than 1000 views per week. This week is not over and already there are currently about 1323 views.

Wonder if the images are being copied for generative ML.

Probably. Look at your logs. If there are any IPs that repeatedly pop up that would be the case of scraping. It can be interesting to do a reverse IP look up on them to maybe get an idea who is doing it.

Digi - the AI girlfriend app

https://www.gptmaster.ai/how-to-use-dig ... ide/?amp=1

Guys who fall for generative ML models are the contemporary version of . . .

As with image and video streaming via the internet, I suspect that porn will drive the development of the generative ML girlfriend . . .

Modernity | Technology Companies Brag About Pornification of AI Girlfriends

. . . to the point where the film and gaming industries will adopt this technology.

Ah yes..... the beauty of unattainable AI generated wimmen.....'>........

Had an amusing thought.

If and when the majority of images of beautiful women posted to the internet are ML-generated [AI],

then the ML image generators will be trained mostly on ML-generated images.

noddy wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2024 10:19 am Screenshot from 2024-01-23 17-16-06.png

I bet this one would have fooled you Noddy
https://va.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_rx52 ... xu_720.mp4

Doc wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 8:47 am

noddy wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2024 10:19 am Screenshot from 2024-01-23 17-16-06.png

I bet this one would have fooled you Noddy
https://va.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_rx52 ... xu_720.mp4

yeh it would at first glance - less plastic, more distinctive features.

at second glance, its either the dead eyes of a jaded sex worker or something uncanny valley, either way, not in my areas of interest

makes me think it isnt ai generated but ai modified - basically a video of a real person but with face and tits tweeked by ai.

noddy wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 10:02 am

Doc wrote: ↑Sun Jan 28, 2024 8:47 am

noddy wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2024 10:19 am Screenshot from 2024-01-23 17-16-06.png

I bet this one would have fooled you Noddy
https://va.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_rx52 ... xu_720.mp4

yeh it would at first glance - less plastic, more distinctive features.

at second glance, its either the dead eyes of a jaded sex worker or something uncanny valley, either way, not in my areas of interest

makes me think it isnt ai generated but ai modified - basically a video of a real person but with face and tits tweeked by ai.

Yeah maybe. I have tried to find an original source on this photo and a couple of others but they all came from social media.

I would guess that creating emotions that would fool nearly everyone will be prove the most difficult part for generative ML.

Far more challenging than getting the number of fingers right.

However, should this be achieved, then actors and actresses may find a rapid decline in the demand for their services.

Typhoon wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2024 2:47 am I would guess that creating emotions that would fool nearly everyone will be prove the most difficult part for generative ML.

Far more challenging than getting the number of fingers right.

However, should this be achieved, then actors and actresses may find a rapid decline in the demand for their services.

Reminds me of the old grade b movie titled something like: "They are killing the top models"

Where a new technology is invented that can impersonate real people making "Top models" redundant.

Or maybe "invasion of the body snatchers"...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94tylnUBXAM

World's First AI Beauty Pageant Announced With Hefty Cash Prize