Offering Senior Citizens willing to give up their social security benefits between 40 to 100 acres of government land in places like Nevada and Alaska......
Williams claims that he is willing to do this......... no matter where the land is located...........
I believe that a person who is 65 years old and has been forced into Social Security is owed something. But the question is, Who owes it to him?
Congress has spent every penny of his Social Security “contribution.”
Young workers have no obligation to be fleeced in order to make up for the dishonesty and dereliction of Congress.
The tragedy is that most seniors just want their money and couldn’t care less about whom Congress takes it from.
Here’s what might be a temporary fix: The federal government owns huge quantities of wasting assets — assets that are not producing anything — 650 million acres of land, almost 30 percent of the land area of the United States.
In exchange for those who choose to opt out of Social Security and forsake any future claim, why not pay them off with 40 or so acres of land? Doing so would give us breathing room to develop a free choice method to finance retirement.
http://lubbockonline.com/editorial-colu ... _ZdA1KBWSo
oYbiMarL2Ps
Not sure about the idea.........'I will exchange all of my Social Security payments in the future for a hundred acres of land in Alaska anywhere -- and they can keep the mule they promised my ancestors'
Reminds me of the old homesteading program.......... Little House on the Prairie / Laura Ingalls Wilder/Melissa Gilbert etc.........
Except with old folks doing the homesteading... .............
What would probably happen is that it would get sold or given to the younger folks.......
Also reminds of what I read happened in San Diego after a Republican Mayor overspent the City into a financial crisis hosting the Republican National Convention some years ago....... Had to sell off a lot of City owned land to solve it........ IIRC parks/parts there of........