Enki wrote:
Umm...the message has always been equally about both. You're mistaking us for the Tea Party that subdivided the message of the Boston Tea Party. The message of OWS is the exact same message of the Boston Tea Party. No corporate monopolies enriching private interests off of taxation while dictating terms to us about how we can govern ourselves. Same as the Boston Tea Party.
No, your own words refute you. Whenever you type "OWS" you only confirm that it is about Wall Street and not DC. With your own fingers you type "OWS". Self refuting typing on your part.
BTW, hilarious on the Boston Tea Party. The Tea Partiers were rejecting taxes, the fleabaggers want to raise taxes.
We do emphasize both equally. It's you who doesn't have a clue. Look, if you're not going to pay attention, even when I say things to you directly, what's the point?
You are free to practice poor PR, and I am free to make fun of you guys for it. It has been an enjoyable relationship for me so far.
Only if you are adopting that model. Most of us find that model repulsive. You think about that model a lot more than I do.
I enjoyed defeating it.
Based on how much you think about Marxism, you are more of a Marxist than I am.
That's like saying a cancer dr has cancer or is cancer. Very good comedy material on your part.
You're the one who is absolutely obsessed with Karl Marx.
No doubt about it. It has paid off in spades.
I don't think about Karl Marx much at all except when I am chatting with Republicans who can't seem to stop thinking about him.
That's how you win. Really study the opponent.
I would explain it, but we're still working on getting you to understand that OWS is about MONEY in POLITICS, and you keep saying it's only about the money and not about politics.
Other fleabaggers tell me it's about the 1% and banks. I'll let you guys work all of that out.
So lets not confuse you with much more complex subjects. It's an easy answer, but since so much of this really easy stuff is going over your head, I don't feel like typing the paragraph.
Fine with me. I will stick with subjects I know about. Like crushing Marxists.
Like I said, you love the actual nannies. Ron Paul would be disgusted by this, and he would disagree with you passionately.
Ron Paul isn't right about everything.
He has made some very eloquent arguments about it in the recent debates. You should look into Ron Paul and listen to what he has to say. Foreign Imperialism is not 'National Defense' and forming a national bureau specifically to attack the left is not the same as 'having police'.
Whatever you say. Foreign policy comes and goes, big government tends to stick around. RP will be very helpful with the latter, the former doesn't really bother me one way or the other.
I know you do. Loving that stuff is hating freedom. You can't do both.
Yes I can.
We know, taking care of old people with a pension fund they paid into and actually reducing the cost of healthcare across the board chaps your hide. But stormtroopers beating leftists and spraying them with chemical weapons, turns you on. I know.
Social security screws old people in a profound way and Obamacare does not reduce the cost of healthcare. The chemical weapon stuff is in Democrat cities, that is out of my hands.
In the long-term or the short-term?
In the long-term: all of it.
In the short-term: any agency that serves no other purpose than to tell people how to live their day to day lives.
Why do you think that after all this time you've never found a way to affiliate with a political movement that will even remotely reduce government? Why is that, do you think?