Fewer Germans agree

Post Reply
AzariLoveIran

Fewer Germans agree

Post by AzariLoveIran »

.

Maybe this belongs to a (new) German Thread


. . as the Holocaust recedes into the past, fewer Germans agree.


.

The Holocaust has defined the relationship between the country of the perpetrators and the country of the victims, so much so that German Chancellor Angela Merkel frequently calls the security of the Jewish state Germany’s responsibility, its “raison d’etre” even.

But not all Germans agree, and the decisions Mrs. Merkel makes based on that "special relationship" stir growing unease among many Germans.

This week Der Spiegel magazine ran a cover story about German submarines being sold to Israel. The article quotes several former members of the German defense ministry alleging that Israel is arming these submarines, delivered at very generous terms, with nuclear cruise missiles and that the German government has been aware of this modification for quite some time.

.
.

“Of course the German government never asked what would happen to these subs,” says Karsten Voigt, a former Social Democrat member of parliament and government coordinator for US-German relations. “The worst thing would have been if the Israelis had said the truth – any German government would have had a hard time defending itself.”

There is no lack of critics.

Günter Grass, a Nobel-Prize-winning German author, found himself at the center of an international scandal when he published a poem a few weeks ago in which he defended Iran against the threat of a military strike by Israel and asked the – rhetorical – question of whether Germany should be part of a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

“I’m speaking out,” Mr. Grass said in his poem, “because my country, scene of crimes beyond comparison, under the pretext of penitence is sending Israel another submarine, which can direct all-destructive warheads toward an area in which not a single nuclear bomb as been proven to exist.”


.
.

. . a poll conducted by the respected Forsa institute just before the visit indicated rising German unease with Israeli government policy.

According to the poll, 60 percent of Germans believe that their country has no special responsibility toward Israel because of the Holocaust; only 33 percent said it does.

On top of that, the poll indicated that 70 percent of Germans believe Israel pursues its interests without consideration for other peoples.

In a similar poll three years ago, only 59 percent were of that opinion. Similarly, the percentage of those who perceive Israel as "aggressive" has risen from 49 to 59 percent.

Thilo Sarazzin, a former director of the German central bank, now a controversial bestselling author, picks up the theme of Holocaust guilt driving German policy in his new book “Europe does not need the euro.” In his view, German willingness to support the common currency and its weaker member states results from guilt.

According to Sarrazin, those advocating eurobonds – collectivized debt guaranteed by the whole eurozone – are “driven by the very German reflex to believe that atonement for the Holocaust and World War II can only be achieved by handing over all our interests, including our money, into European hands.”

.

.
User avatar
monster_gardener
Posts: 5334
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 12:36 am
Location: Trolla. Land of upside down trees and tomatos........

PIIGS as the Wurst Nations in Europe.....

Post by monster_gardener »

AzariLoveIran wrote:.

Maybe this belongs to a (new) German Thread


. . as the Holocaust recedes into the past, fewer Germans agree.


.

The Holocaust has defined the relationship between the country of the perpetrators and the country of the victims, so much so that German Chancellor Angela Merkel frequently calls the security of the Jewish state Germany’s responsibility, its “raison d’etre” even.

But not all Germans agree, and the decisions Mrs. Merkel makes based on that "special relationship" stir growing unease among many Germans.

This week Der Spiegel magazine ran a cover story about German submarines being sold to Israel. The article quotes several former members of the German defense ministry alleging that Israel is arming these submarines, delivered at very generous terms, with nuclear cruise missiles and that the German government has been aware of this modification for quite some time.

.
.

“Of course the German government never asked what would happen to these subs,” says Karsten Voigt, a former Social Democrat member of parliament and government coordinator for US-German relations. “The worst thing would have been if the Israelis had said the truth – any German government would have had a hard time defending itself.”

There is no lack of critics.

Günter Grass, a Nobel-Prize-winning German author, found himself at the center of an international scandal when he published a poem a few weeks ago in which he defended Iran against the threat of a military strike by Israel and asked the – rhetorical – question of whether Germany should be part of a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

“I’m speaking out,” Mr. Grass said in his poem, “because my country, scene of crimes beyond comparison, under the pretext of penitence is sending Israel another submarine, which can direct all-destructive warheads toward an area in which not a single nuclear bomb as been proven to exist.”


.
.

. . a poll conducted by the respected Forsa institute just before the visit indicated rising German unease with Israeli government policy.

According to the poll, 60 percent of Germans believe that their country has no special responsibility toward Israel because of the Holocaust; only 33 percent said it does.

On top of that, the poll indicated that 70 percent of Germans believe Israel pursues its interests without consideration for other peoples.

In a similar poll three years ago, only 59 percent were of that opinion. Similarly, the percentage of those who perceive Israel as "aggressive" has risen from 49 to 59 percent.

Thilo Sarazzin, a former director of the German central bank, now a controversial bestselling author, picks up the theme of Holocaust guilt driving German policy in his new book “Europe does not need the euro.” In his view, German willingness to support the common currency and its weaker member states results from guilt.

According to Sarrazin, those advocating eurobonds – collectivized debt guaranteed by the whole eurozone – are “driven by the very German reflex to believe that atonement for the Holocaust and World War II can only be achieved by handing over all our interests, including our money, into European hands.”

.

.
Thank You Very Much For your Post, Azari.

poll indicated that 70 percent of Germans believe Israel pursues its interests without consideration for other peoples.
Just wondering what percent of the PIIGS think that Germany considers them to be the Wurst :twisted: Nations in Europe and that Germany pursues its interests without consideration for other people :wink:

“driven by the very German reflex to believe that atonement for the Holocaust and World War II can only be achieved by handing over all our interests, including our money, into European hands.”
Probably true.........

Germany was forgiven a lot and did have a lot of atoning to do but handing it all to the Eurocrats IMVHO is probably not the answer......
For the love of G_d, consider you & I may be mistaken.
Orion Must Rise: Killer Space Rocks Coming Our way
The Best Laid Plans of Men, Monkeys & Pigs Oft Go Awry
Woe to those who long for the Day of the Lord, for It is Darkness, Not Light
AzariLoveIran

Re: PIIGS as the Wurst Nations in Europe.....

Post by AzariLoveIran »

monster_gardener wrote:.
AzariLoveIran wrote:.

Maybe this belongs to a (new) German Thread


. . as the Holocaust recedes into the past, fewer Germans agree.


.

The Holocaust has defined the relationship between the country of the perpetrators and the country of the victims, so much so that German Chancellor Angela Merkel frequently calls the security of the Jewish state Germany’s responsibility, its “raison d’etre” even.

But not all Germans agree, and the decisions Mrs. Merkel makes based on that "special relationship" stir growing unease among many Germans.

This week Der Spiegel magazine ran a cover story about German submarines being sold to Israel. The article quotes several former members of the German defense ministry alleging that Israel is arming these submarines, delivered at very generous terms, with nuclear cruise missiles and that the German government has been aware of this modification for quite some time.

.
.

“Of course the German government never asked what would happen to these subs,” says Karsten Voigt, a former Social Democrat member of parliament and government coordinator for US-German relations. “The worst thing would have been if the Israelis had said the truth – any German government would have had a hard time defending itself.”

There is no lack of critics.

Günter Grass, a Nobel-Prize-winning German author, found himself at the center of an international scandal when he published a poem a few weeks ago in which he defended Iran against the threat of a military strike by Israel and asked the – rhetorical – question of whether Germany should be part of a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

“I’m speaking out,” Mr. Grass said in his poem, “because my country, scene of crimes beyond comparison, under the pretext of penitence is sending Israel another submarine, which can direct all-destructive warheads toward an area in which not a single nuclear bomb as been proven to exist.”


.
.

. . a poll conducted by the respected Forsa institute just before the visit indicated rising German unease with Israeli government policy.

According to the poll, 60 percent of Germans believe that their country has no special responsibility toward Israel because of the Holocaust; only 33 percent said it does.

On top of that, the poll indicated that 70 percent of Germans believe Israel pursues its interests without consideration for other peoples.

In a similar poll three years ago, only 59 percent were of that opinion. Similarly, the percentage of those who perceive Israel as "aggressive" has risen from 49 to 59 percent.

Thilo Sarazzin, a former director of the German central bank, now a controversial bestselling author, picks up the theme of Holocaust guilt driving German policy in his new book “Europe does not need the euro.” In his view, German willingness to support the common currency and its weaker member states results from guilt.

According to Sarrazin, those advocating eurobonds – collectivized debt guaranteed by the whole eurozone – are “driven by the very German reflex to believe that atonement for the Holocaust and World War II can only be achieved by handing over all our interests, including our money, into European hands.”

.

.
Thank You Very Much For your Post, Azari.

poll indicated that 70 percent of Germans believe Israel pursues its interests without consideration for other peoples.
Just wondering what percent of the PIIGS think that Germany considers them to be the Wurst :twisted: Nations in Europe and that Germany pursues its interests without consideration for other people :wink:

“driven by the very German reflex to believe that atonement for the Holocaust and World War II can only be achieved by handing over all our interests, including our money, into European hands.”
Probably true.........

Germany was forgiven a lot and did have a lot of atoning to do but handing it all to the Eurocrats IMVHO is probably not the answer.....

.

Love German wurst and most German things (including the lovely Fräulein)

look

a great injustice is done to Germans .. GREAT injustice

what Germans did is not even 1% what Brits did

poor Germans .. poor Germans


That Holocaust rubbish just garbage .. Zionist garbage

World Jewish Congress was in Bed with Nazi .. I posted a lot of articles, from Jewish press, in FT, and that was one of the reason they banned Azari

can post them here if you wish, Monster

this whole episode with Germans and Jews of Europe of that time is a hoax .. built up by Zionist to usurp ME land

not saying Adolf did not do what he did

but much much worst things were done by Brits, and they still @ it

same with Dutch and French and Belgians and and and

Germans were by far the least beast of all of them


.
User avatar
monster_gardener
Posts: 5334
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 12:36 am
Location: Trolla. Land of upside down trees and tomatos........

British vs. Germans........

Post by monster_gardener »

AzariLoveIran wrote:
monster_gardener wrote:.
AzariLoveIran wrote:.

Maybe this belongs to a (new) German Thread


. . as the Holocaust recedes into the past, fewer Germans agree.


.

The Holocaust has defined the relationship between the country of the perpetrators and the country of the victims, so much so that German Chancellor Angela Merkel frequently calls the security of the Jewish state Germany’s responsibility, its “raison d’etre” even.

But not all Germans agree, and the decisions Mrs. Merkel makes based on that "special relationship" stir growing unease among many Germans.

This week Der Spiegel magazine ran a cover story about German submarines being sold to Israel. The article quotes several former members of the German defense ministry alleging that Israel is arming these submarines, delivered at very generous terms, with nuclear cruise missiles and that the German government has been aware of this modification for quite some time.

.
.

“Of course the German government never asked what would happen to these subs,” says Karsten Voigt, a former Social Democrat member of parliament and government coordinator for US-German relations. “The worst thing would have been if the Israelis had said the truth – any German government would have had a hard time defending itself.”

There is no lack of critics.

Günter Grass, a Nobel-Prize-winning German author, found himself at the center of an international scandal when he published a poem a few weeks ago in which he defended Iran against the threat of a military strike by Israel and asked the – rhetorical – question of whether Germany should be part of a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

“I’m speaking out,” Mr. Grass said in his poem, “because my country, scene of crimes beyond comparison, under the pretext of penitence is sending Israel another submarine, which can direct all-destructive warheads toward an area in which not a single nuclear bomb as been proven to exist.”


.
.

. . a poll conducted by the respected Forsa institute just before the visit indicated rising German unease with Israeli government policy.

According to the poll, 60 percent of Germans believe that their country has no special responsibility toward Israel because of the Holocaust; only 33 percent said it does.

On top of that, the poll indicated that 70 percent of Germans believe Israel pursues its interests without consideration for other peoples.

In a similar poll three years ago, only 59 percent were of that opinion. Similarly, the percentage of those who perceive Israel as "aggressive" has risen from 49 to 59 percent.

Thilo Sarazzin, a former director of the German central bank, now a controversial bestselling author, picks up the theme of Holocaust guilt driving German policy in his new book “Europe does not need the euro.” In his view, German willingness to support the common currency and its weaker member states results from guilt.

According to Sarrazin, those advocating eurobonds – collectivized debt guaranteed by the whole eurozone – are “driven by the very German reflex to believe that atonement for the Holocaust and World War II can only be achieved by handing over all our interests, including our money, into European hands.”

.

.
Thank You Very Much For your Post, Azari.

poll indicated that 70 percent of Germans believe Israel pursues its interests without consideration for other peoples.
Just wondering what percent of the PIIGS think that Germany considers them to be the Wurst :twisted: Nations in Europe and that Germany pursues its interests without consideration for other people :wink:

“driven by the very German reflex to believe that atonement for the Holocaust and World War II can only be achieved by handing over all our interests, including our money, into European hands.”
Probably true.........

Germany was forgiven a lot and did have a lot of atoning to do but handing it all to the Eurocrats IMVHO is probably not the answer.....

.

Love German wurst and most German things (including the lovely Fräulein)

look

a great injustice is done to Germans .. GREAT injustice

what Germans did is not even 1% what Brits did

poor Germans .. poor Germans


That Holocaust rubbish just garbage .. Zionist garbage

World Jewish Congress was in Bed with Nazi .. I posted a lot of articles, from Jewish press, in FT, and that was one of the reason they banned Azari

can post them here if you wish, Monster

this whole episode with Germans and Jews of Europe of that time is a hoax .. built up by Zionist to usurp ME land

not saying Adolf did not do what he did

but much much worst things were done by Brits, and they still @ it

same with Dutch and French and Belgians and and and

Germans were by far the least beast of all of them


.
Thank you Very Much for your post, Azari......
Germans were by far the least beast of all of them
The Germans got into the Colonial Game outside of Europe later than the rest but when they did, they made up for lost time... and not just Jews....... Namibia...
.... Herero Genocide......

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herero_and ... a_Genocide



Herero and Namaqua Genocide

The Herero and Namaqua Genocide is considered to have been the first genocide of the 20th century.[1][2][3][4][5] It took place between 1904 and 1907 in German South-West Africa (modern day Namibia), during the scramble for Africa.

On January 12, 1904, the Herero people, led by Samuel Maharero, rebelled against German colonial rule. In August, German general Lothar von Trotha defeated the Herero in the Battle of Waterberg and drove them into the desert of Omaheke, where most of them died of thirst. In October, the Nama people also rebelled against the Germans only to suffer a similar fate.

In total, from 24,000 up to 100,000 Herero and 10,000 Nama died.[6][7][8][9][10] The genocide was characterized by widespread death by starvation and thirst because the Herero who fled the violence were prevented from returning from the Namib Desert. Some sources also claim that the German colonial army systematically poisoned desert wells.[11][12]

In 1985, the United Nations' Whitaker Report classified the aftermath as an attempt to exterminate the Herero and Nama peoples of South-West Africa, and theref
The British did do some bad things...... Opium War for example and you know better than me about what the sad and silly Great Game meant to Iran.......

My flawed hero, Andy Jackson, hated the British with a passion because when he was a prisoner of war, a British officer hit him on his face with a sword when Andy refused to clean his boots.... but Andy survived...... If Andy had been a servant in a concentration camp........
And Andy got his revenge....... notably at the Battle of New Orleans........

IMVHO the British were often not as bad as some of the other colonial powers..... Belgium........ Germany.........

Just ask some of the Native Americans such as Thayendanegea a.k.a. Joseph Brant

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Brant

The Brits weren't perfect but during the 19th Century, the Native American preferred the Great Mother/Queen Victoria to the Great Father/American President and would flee to her territory when in trouble

Or the Miskito Indians of Central America who long for the British to return and have the protection of having their Chief being a Vassal of the British Crown......

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miskito_pe ... o_Alliance


Remember also that the British put down the Slave Trade from Africa to the Americas....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Wi ... lave_trade

They did do some bad things in India........ but had enough of a conscience that Gandhi was able to overcome them without weapons.......
IIRC fewer lives lost in that struggle than when India and Pakistan separated later.......

Or what might have happened if the Germans had beaten the British in WW2 and taken over India...
Doubt Ghandi would have had the same success..... Unless the high castes could have persuaded the Nazis that they were good Aryans too... all the swastikas even though they were the "wrong" ;) way from the Nazi one........ Maybe not..... Nazis don't like race mixers/traitors ........ maybe there would have been a brown paper bag test on steroids for the Indians.........

All in all....... IMVHO, the Brits were better than the Germans.....
For the love of G_d, consider you & I may be mistaken.
Orion Must Rise: Killer Space Rocks Coming Our way
The Best Laid Plans of Men, Monkeys & Pigs Oft Go Awry
Woe to those who long for the Day of the Lord, for It is Darkness, Not Light
AzariLoveIran

Re: British vs. Germans........

Post by AzariLoveIran »

monster_gardener wrote:.
AzariLoveIran wrote:.
monster_gardener wrote:.
AzariLoveIran wrote:.

Maybe this belongs to a (new) German Thread


. . as the Holocaust recedes into the past, fewer Germans agree.


.

The Holocaust has defined the relationship between the country of the perpetrators and the country of the victims, so much so that German Chancellor Angela Merkel frequently calls the security of the Jewish state Germany’s responsibility, its “raison d’etre” even.

But not all Germans agree, and the decisions Mrs. Merkel makes based on that "special relationship" stir growing unease among many Germans.

This week Der Spiegel magazine ran a cover story about German submarines being sold to Israel. The article quotes several former members of the German defense ministry alleging that Israel is arming these submarines, delivered at very generous terms, with nuclear cruise missiles and that the German government has been aware of this modification for quite some time.

.
.

“Of course the German government never asked what would happen to these subs,” says Karsten Voigt, a former Social Democrat member of parliament and government coordinator for US-German relations. “The worst thing would have been if the Israelis had said the truth – any German government would have had a hard time defending itself.”

There is no lack of critics.

Günter Grass, a Nobel-Prize-winning German author, found himself at the center of an international scandal when he published a poem a few weeks ago in which he defended Iran against the threat of a military strike by Israel and asked the – rhetorical – question of whether Germany should be part of a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

“I’m speaking out,” Mr. Grass said in his poem, “because my country, scene of crimes beyond comparison, under the pretext of penitence is sending Israel another submarine, which can direct all-destructive warheads toward an area in which not a single nuclear bomb as been proven to exist.”


.
.

. . a poll conducted by the respected Forsa institute just before the visit indicated rising German unease with Israeli government policy.

According to the poll, 60 percent of Germans believe that their country has no special responsibility toward Israel because of the Holocaust; only 33 percent said it does.

On top of that, the poll indicated that 70 percent of Germans believe Israel pursues its interests without consideration for other peoples.

In a similar poll three years ago, only 59 percent were of that opinion. Similarly, the percentage of those who perceive Israel as "aggressive" has risen from 49 to 59 percent.

Thilo Sarazzin, a former director of the German central bank, now a controversial bestselling author, picks up the theme of Holocaust guilt driving German policy in his new book “Europe does not need the euro.” In his view, German willingness to support the common currency and its weaker member states results from guilt.

According to Sarrazin, those advocating eurobonds – collectivized debt guaranteed by the whole eurozone – are “driven by the very German reflex to believe that atonement for the Holocaust and World War II can only be achieved by handing over all our interests, including our money, into European hands.”

.

.
Thank You Very Much For your Post, Azari.

poll indicated that 70 percent of Germans believe Israel pursues its interests without consideration for other peoples.
Just wondering what percent of the PIIGS think that Germany considers them to be the Wurst :twisted: Nations in Europe and that Germany pursues its interests without consideration for other people :wink:

“driven by the very German reflex to believe that atonement for the Holocaust and World War II can only be achieved by handing over all our interests, including our money, into European hands.”
Probably true.........

Germany was forgiven a lot and did have a lot of atoning to do but handing it all to the Eurocrats IMVHO is probably not the answer.....

.

Love German wurst and most German things (including the lovely Fräulein)

look

a great injustice is done to Germans .. GREAT injustice

what Germans did is not even 1% what Brits did

poor Germans .. poor Germans


That Holocaust rubbish just garbage .. Zionist garbage

World Jewish Congress was in Bed with Nazi .. I posted a lot of articles, from Jewish press, in FT, and that was one of the reason they banned Azari

can post them here if you wish, Monster

this whole episode with Germans and Jews of Europe of that time is a hoax .. built up by Zionist to usurp ME land

not saying Adolf did not do what he did

but much much worst things were done by Brits, and they still @ it

same with Dutch and French and Belgians and and and

Germans were by far the least beast of all of them


.
.

monster_gardener wrote:.
AzariLoveIran wrote:.

Germans were by far the least beast of all of them

.
The Germans got into the Colonial Game outside of Europe later than the rest but when they did, they made up for lost time... and not just Jews....... Namibia...
.... Herero Genocide......

.

Come on Mosnster, Come on

Namibia has 2.1 million population , back then when Germans were there probably 1 million population

If Germans had killed 100% of Namibian population, would have made not even a dent of British and French and Dutch and Belgian and and Genocides during last 200 years

Genocide ? ?

All colonial rule was genocide

did Vietnamese voluntarily become French colony, or Indonesians or all those Africans ?

Germans, in this regard the most innocent


monster_gardener wrote:.

The British did do some bad things ...... Opium War for example and you know better than me about what the sad and silly Great Game meant to Iran .......

.

:lol: that was good one, Monster :lol: did do some bad things


The point with Brits .. the difference between Brits and Germans .. were not that Brits were more vicious than Germans (only difference was the style, Germans no nonsense, Brits more diplomatic)

no

the difference was that the Germans wanted access to natural resources (they joined the party later when natural resources were the issue)

but

Brits wanted "parasitism" .. meaning ride others .. Africa belonged to a few lords, fertile African land .. India same

later on, natural resources, Oil and Gas and copper and Iron became the issue

Brits wanted to live from other people's work .. parasitism

and

Brits same Brits as B4 .. still Parasite

monster_gardener wrote:.

They did do some bad things in India........ but had enough of a conscience that Gandhi was able to overcome them without weapons.......

IIRC fewer lives lost in that struggle than when India and Pakistan separated later.......

Or what might have happened if the Germans had beaten the British in WW2 and taken over India...
Doubt Ghandi would have had the same success..... Unless the high castes could have persuaded the Nazis that they were good Aryans too... all the swastikas even though they were the "wrong" ;) way from the Nazi one........ Maybe not..... Nazis don't like race mixers/traitors ........ maybe there would have been a brown paper bag test on steroids for the Indians.........

All in all....... IMVHO, the Brits were better than the Germans....

.

Not so

Germans were never colonial power .. Germans never lived from other people's work

Brits did .. their specialty


.
User avatar
monster_gardener
Posts: 5334
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 12:36 am
Location: Trolla. Land of upside down trees and tomatos........

British vs. Germans........ 2

Post by monster_gardener »

AzariLoveIran wrote:
monster_gardener wrote:.
AzariLoveIran wrote:.
monster_gardener wrote:.
AzariLoveIran wrote:.

Maybe this belongs to a (new) German Thread


. . as the Holocaust recedes into the past, fewer Germans agree.


.

The Holocaust has defined the relationship between the country of the perpetrators and the country of the victims, so much so that German Chancellor Angela Merkel frequently calls the security of the Jewish state Germany’s responsibility, its “raison d’etre” even.

But not all Germans agree, and the decisions Mrs. Merkel makes based on that "special relationship" stir growing unease among many Germans.

This week Der Spiegel magazine ran a cover story about German submarines being sold to Israel. The article quotes several former members of the German defense ministry alleging that Israel is arming these submarines, delivered at very generous terms, with nuclear cruise missiles and that the German government has been aware of this modification for quite some time.

.
.

“Of course the German government never asked what would happen to these subs,” says Karsten Voigt, a former Social Democrat member of parliament and government coordinator for US-German relations. “The worst thing would have been if the Israelis had said the truth – any German government would have had a hard time defending itself.”

There is no lack of critics.

Günter Grass, a Nobel-Prize-winning German author, found himself at the center of an international scandal when he published a poem a few weeks ago in which he defended Iran against the threat of a military strike by Israel and asked the – rhetorical – question of whether Germany should be part of a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

“I’m speaking out,” Mr. Grass said in his poem, “because my country, scene of crimes beyond comparison, under the pretext of penitence is sending Israel another submarine, which can direct all-destructive warheads toward an area in which not a single nuclear bomb as been proven to exist.”


.
.

. . a poll conducted by the respected Forsa institute just before the visit indicated rising German unease with Israeli government policy.

According to the poll, 60 percent of Germans believe that their country has no special responsibility toward Israel because of the Holocaust; only 33 percent said it does.

On top of that, the poll indicated that 70 percent of Germans believe Israel pursues its interests without consideration for other peoples.

In a similar poll three years ago, only 59 percent were of that opinion. Similarly, the percentage of those who perceive Israel as "aggressive" has risen from 49 to 59 percent.

Thilo Sarazzin, a former director of the German central bank, now a controversial bestselling author, picks up the theme of Holocaust guilt driving German policy in his new book “Europe does not need the euro.” In his view, German willingness to support the common currency and its weaker member states results from guilt.

According to Sarrazin, those advocating eurobonds – collectivized debt guaranteed by the whole eurozone – are “driven by the very German reflex to believe that atonement for the Holocaust and World War II can only be achieved by handing over all our interests, including our money, into European hands.”

.

.
Thank You Very Much For your Post, Azari.

poll indicated that 70 percent of Germans believe Israel pursues its interests without consideration for other peoples.
Just wondering what percent of the PIIGS think that Germany considers them to be the Wurst :twisted: Nations in Europe and that Germany pursues its interests without consideration for other people :wink:

“driven by the very German reflex to believe that atonement for the Holocaust and World War II can only be achieved by handing over all our interests, including our money, into European hands.”
Probably true.........

Germany was forgiven a lot and did have a lot of atoning to do but handing it all to the Eurocrats IMVHO is probably not the answer.....

.

Love German wurst and most German things (including the lovely Fräulein)

look

a great injustice is done to Germans .. GREAT injustice

what Germans did is not even 1% what Brits did

poor Germans .. poor Germans


That Holocaust rubbish just garbage .. Zionist garbage

World Jewish Congress was in Bed with Nazi .. I posted a lot of articles, from Jewish press, in FT, and that was one of the reason they banned Azari

can post them here if you wish, Monster

this whole episode with Germans and Jews of Europe of that time is a hoax .. built up by Zionist to usurp ME land

not saying Adolf did not do what he did

but much much worst things were done by Brits, and they still @ it

same with Dutch and French and Belgians and and and

Germans were by far the least beast of all of them


.
.

monster_gardener wrote:.
AzariLoveIran wrote:.

Germans were by far the least beast of all of them

.
The Germans got into the Colonial Game outside of Europe later than the rest but when they did, they made up for lost time... and not just Jews....... Namibia...
.... Herero Genocide......

.

Come on Mosnster, Come on

Namibia has 2.1 million population , back then when Germans were there probably 1 million population

If Germans had killed 100% of Namibian population, would have made not even a dent of British and French and Dutch and Belgian and and Genocides during last 200 years

Genocide ? ?

All colonial rule was genocide

did Vietnamese voluntarily become French colony, or Indonesians or all those Africans ?

Germans, in this regard the most innocent


monster_gardener wrote:.

The British did do some bad things ...... Opium War for example and you know better than me about what the sad and silly Great Game meant to Iran .......

.

:lol: that was good one, Monster :lol: did do some bad things


The point with Brits .. the difference between Brits and Germans .. were not that Brits were more vicious than Germans (only difference was the style, Germans no nonsense, Brits more diplomatic)

no

the difference was that the Germans wanted access to natural resources (they joined the party later when natural resources were the issue)

but

Brits wanted "parasitism" .. meaning ride others .. Africa belonged to a few lords, fertile African land .. India same

later on, natural resources, Oil and Gas and copper and Iron became the issue

Brits wanted to live from other people's work .. parasitism

and

Brits same Brits as B4 .. still Parasite

monster_gardener wrote:.

They did do some bad things in India........ but had enough of a conscience that Gandhi was able to overcome them without weapons.......

IIRC fewer lives lost in that struggle than when India and Pakistan separated later.......

Or what might have happened if the Germans had beaten the British in WW2 and taken over India...
Doubt Ghandi would have had the same success..... Unless the high castes could have persuaded the Nazis that they were good Aryans too... all the swastikas even though they were the "wrong" ;) way from the Nazi one........ Maybe not..... Nazis don't like race mixers/traitors ........ maybe there would have been a brown paper bag test on steroids for the Indians.........

All in all....... IMVHO, the Brits were better than the Germans....

.

Not so

Germans were never colonial power .. Germans never lived from other people's work

Brits did .. their specialty


.
Thank you Very Much for your post, Azari.
(only difference was the style,
Style can be very important..... Can save your life...... Can mean that the Chinese Ambassador almost got Queen Victoria to stop the Opium on moral grounds.......
Germans no nonsense, Brits more diplomatic)
Quite Right.

I would say that the Germans are/were mechanistic in their evil.... running factories of death......

My impression is that for some of the British, evil is a game........ Sometimes a Great Game....

But that can mean that an opponent has more of a chance and may get some respect....... The fox hunters don't want the fox to meekly wait for the hounds like a lamb.... or a Jew being sent into a German gas chamber.........
Germans were never colonial power ..
Namibia/South West Africa was a COLONY......

They were only in charge for 30 years but they did some much damage that if they had been there longer probably no native would have survived....
Namibia became a German colony in 1884 to forestall British encroachment and was known as German South-West Africa (Deutsch-Südwestafrika).[11] However, the Palgrave mission by the British governor in Cape Town had determined that only the natural deep-water harbour of Walvis Bay (Walfisch in German, Walvis in Afrikaans, Whale in English) was worth occupying – and this was annexed to the Cape province of British South Africa. From 1904 to 1907, the Herero and the Namaqua took up arms against the Germans and in the subsequent Herero and Namaqua genocide, 10,000 Nama (half the population) and approximately 65,000 Hereros (about 80% of the population) were killed.[12][13] The survivors, when finally released from detention, were subjected to a policy of dispossession, deportation, forced labor, racial segregation and discrimination in a system that in many ways anticipated apartheid. Most Africans were confined to so-called native territories, which later under South African rule post-1949 were turned into "homelands" (Bantustans). Indeed, some historians have speculated that the German genocide in Namibia was a model used by Nazis in the Holocaust,[14] but most scholars say that episode was not especially influential for the Nazis, who were children at the time[citation needed]. However, the father of Luftwaffe commander Hermann Göring was a one-time German colonial governor of Namibia and has a street named after him in Swakopmund.[15] The memory of genocide remains relevant to ethnic identity in independent Namibia and to relations with Germany.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namibia#German_rule

I remember reading how decades later, the German colonists remained there and kept pictures of Hitler on their walls as a shrine.........

Germans never lived from other people's work
During WW2 the Germans looted almost every part of Europe where they went.... The High Nazis stole national treasuries and looted museums while the low Nazis/German soldiers bought up everything in the stores with the fixed currencies down to the last egg and stick of butter and took it back home to Germany when on leave..... Got so bad that Nazi diplomats complained that it was promoted unrest in the occupied territories and even with "allies" but were overruled but that was how the Nazis were buying social peace at home. When the Western Allies finally reached Germany, they noted how much better fed the people were compared to the occupied nations such as Greece etc.......
For the love of G_d, consider you & I may be mistaken.
Orion Must Rise: Killer Space Rocks Coming Our way
The Best Laid Plans of Men, Monkeys & Pigs Oft Go Awry
Woe to those who long for the Day of the Lord, for It is Darkness, Not Light
AzariLoveIran

Re: British vs. Germans........ 2

Post by AzariLoveIran »

monster_gardener wrote:.
(only difference was the style,
Style can be very important..... Can save your life...... Can mean that the Chinese Ambassador almost got Queen Victoria to stop the Opium on moral grounds.......
Germans no nonsense, Brits more diplomatic)
Quite Right.

I would say that the Germans are/were mechanistic in their evil.... running factories of death......

My impression is that for some of the British, evil is a game........ Sometimes a Great Game....

But that can mean that an opponent has more of a chance and may get some respect....... The fox hunters don't want the fox to meekly wait for the hounds like a lamb.... or a Jew being sent into a German gas chamber.........
Germans were never colonial power ..
Namibia/South West Africa was a COLONY......

They were only in charge for 30 years but they did some much damage that if they had been there longer probably no native would have survived....
Namibia became a German colony in 1884 to forestall British encroachment and was known as German South-West Africa (Deutsch-Südwestafrika).[11] However, the Palgrave mission by the British governor in Cape Town had determined that only the natural deep-water harbour of Walvis Bay (Walfisch in German, Walvis in Afrikaans, Whale in English) was worth occupying – and this was annexed to the Cape province of British South Africa. From 1904 to 1907, the Herero and the Namaqua took up arms against the Germans and in the subsequent Herero and Namaqua genocide, 10,000 Nama (half the population) and approximately 65,000 Hereros (about 80% of the population) were killed.[12][13] The survivors, when finally released from detention, were subjected to a policy of dispossession, deportation, forced labor, racial segregation and discrimination in a system that in many ways anticipated apartheid. Most Africans were confined to so-called native territories, which later under South African rule post-1949 were turned into "homelands" (Bantustans). Indeed, some historians have speculated that the German genocide in Namibia was a model used by Nazis in the Holocaust,[14] but most scholars say that episode was not especially influential for the Nazis, who were children at the time[citation needed]. However, the father of Luftwaffe commander Hermann Göring was a one-time German colonial governor of Namibia and has a street named after him in Swakopmund.[15] The memory of genocide remains relevant to ethnic identity in independent Namibia and to relations with Germany.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namibia#German_rule

I remember reading how decades later, the German colonists remained there and kept pictures of Hitler on their walls as a shrine.........

Germans never lived from other people's work
During WW2 the Germans looted almost every part of Europe where they went.... The High Nazis stole national treasuries and looted museums while the low Nazis/German soldiers bought up everything in the stores with the fixed currencies down to the last egg and stick of butter and took it back home to Germany when on leave..... Got so bad that Nazi diplomats complained that it was promoted unrest in the occupied territories and even with "allies" but were overruled but that was how the Nazis were buying social peace at home. When the Western Allies finally reached Germany, they noted how much better fed the people were compared to the occupied nations such as Greece etc......

.


As said, if Germans would have killed all Namibia, would have made 1 million dead

French killed millions in Algeria alone

Germans were more effective, they not worst but more Gründlich .. that's the way they are

:lol: that was really funny with German looting

Monster, British Museum & Louvre (and a few others) had to close if it were not for those things Greek and Egyptian and Roman and Persian stuff there

What do the Brits have ? ?

Brits even much worst than made up "Jewish History"

Even Shakespeare was invented

come on, Monster, come on

Germans, NAZI, looting this and that, paintings and art ? ? :lol:

Mesopotamian, Baghdad, Museum was first thing to be plundered, even before the Oil ministry (special embarrassing files all disappeared .. CIA special unit)

Getty Museum all looted stuff .. not a single one legally exited Greece, Egypt, Iran, Italy

Buying those stuff in auction does not mean they legal

All those stuff are property of origin

Greece and Iran want them back



.
AzariLoveIran

Re: British vs. Germans........ 2

Post by AzariLoveIran »

monster_gardener wrote:.
(only difference was the style,
Style can be very important..... Can save your life...... Can mean that the Chinese Ambassador almost got Queen Victoria to stop the Opium on moral grounds.......
Germans no nonsense, Brits more diplomatic)
Quite Right.

I would say that the Germans are/were mechanistic in their evil.... running factories of death......

My impression is that for some of the British, evil is a game........ Sometimes a Great Game....

But that can mean that an opponent has more of a chance and may get some respect....... The fox hunters don't want the fox to meekly wait for the hounds like a lamb.... or a Jew being sent into a German gas chamber.........
Germans were never colonial power ..
Namibia/South West Africa was a COLONY......

They were only in charge for 30 years but they did some much damage that if they had been there longer probably no native would have survived....
Namibia became a German colony in 1884 to forestall British encroachment and was known as German South-West Africa (Deutsch-Südwestafrika).[11] However, the Palgrave mission by the British governor in Cape Town had determined that only the natural deep-water harbour of Walvis Bay (Walfisch in German, Walvis in Afrikaans, Whale in English) was worth occupying – and this was annexed to the Cape province of British South Africa. From 1904 to 1907, the Herero and the Namaqua took up arms against the Germans and in the subsequent Herero and Namaqua genocide, 10,000 Nama (half the population) and approximately 65,000 Hereros (about 80% of the population) were killed.[12][13] The survivors, when finally released from detention, were subjected to a policy of dispossession, deportation, forced labor, racial segregation and discrimination in a system that in many ways anticipated apartheid. Most Africans were confined to so-called native territories, which later under South African rule post-1949 were turned into "homelands" (Bantustans). Indeed, some historians have speculated that the German genocide in Namibia was a model used by Nazis in the Holocaust,[14] but most scholars say that episode was not especially influential for the Nazis, who were children at the time[citation needed]. However, the father of Luftwaffe commander Hermann Göring was a one-time German colonial governor of Namibia and has a street named after him in Swakopmund.[15] The memory of genocide remains relevant to ethnic identity in independent Namibia and to relations with Germany.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namibia#German_rule

I remember reading how decades later, the German colonists remained there and kept pictures of Hitler on their walls as a shrine.........

Germans never lived from other people's work
During WW2 the Germans looted almost every part of Europe where they went.... The High Nazis stole national treasuries and looted museums while the low Nazis/German soldiers bought up everything in the stores with the fixed currencies down to the last egg and stick of butter and took it back home to Germany when on leave..... Got so bad that Nazi diplomats complained that it was promoted unrest in the occupied territories and even with "allies" but were overruled but that was how the Nazis were buying social peace at home. When the Western Allies finally reached Germany, they noted how much better fed the people were compared to the occupied nations such as Greece etc......

.


As said, if Germans would have killed all Namibia, would make 1 million dead

French killed millions in Algeria alone

Germans were more effective, they not worst but more Gründlich .. that's the way they are

:lol: that was really funny with German looting

Monster, British Museum & Louvre (and a few others) had to close if it were not for those things Greek and Egyptian and Roman and Persian stuff there

What do the Brits have ? ?

Brits even much worst than made up "Jewish History"

Even Shakespeare invented

come on, Monster, come on

Germans, NAZI, looting this and that, paintings and art ? ? :lol:

Mesopotamian, Baghdad, Museum was first thing to be plundered, even before the Oil ministry (special embarrassing files all disappeared .. CIA special unit)

Special units were trained to loot Baghdad museum immediately in first hour .. a few items, just to fool,were returned, but most gone and will surface later in western museums

Getty Museum all looted stuff .. not a single one legally exited Greece, Egypt, Iran, Italy

Buying those stuff in auction does not mean they legal

All those stuff are property of origin

Greece and Iran want them back



.
User avatar
monster_gardener
Posts: 5334
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 12:36 am
Location: Trolla. Land of upside down trees and tomatos........

Sloppy Monsters vs. Thorough Monsters/Art vsPolterbends.

Post by monster_gardener »

AzariLoveIran wrote:
monster_gardener wrote:.
(only difference was the style,
Style can be very important..... Can save your life...... Can mean that the Chinese Ambassador almost got Queen Victoria to stop the Opium on moral grounds.......
Germans no nonsense, Brits more diplomatic)
Quite Right.

I would say that the Germans are/were mechanistic in their evil.... running factories of death......

My impression is that for some of the British, evil is a game........ Sometimes a Great Game....

But that can mean that an opponent has more of a chance and may get some respect....... The fox hunters don't want the fox to meekly wait for the hounds like a lamb.... or a Jew being sent into a German gas chamber.........
Germans were never colonial power ..
Namibia/South West Africa was a COLONY......

They were only in charge for 30 years but they did some much damage that if they had been there longer probably no native would have survived....
Namibia became a German colony in 1884 to forestall British encroachment and was known as German South-West Africa (Deutsch-Südwestafrika).[11] However, the Palgrave mission by the British governor in Cape Town had determined that only the natural deep-water harbour of Walvis Bay (Walfisch in German, Walvis in Afrikaans, Whale in English) was worth occupying – and this was annexed to the Cape province of British South Africa. From 1904 to 1907, the Herero and the Namaqua took up arms against the Germans and in the subsequent Herero and Namaqua genocide, 10,000 Nama (half the population) and approximately 65,000 Hereros (about 80% of the population) were killed.[12][13] The survivors, when finally released from detention, were subjected to a policy of dispossession, deportation, forced labor, racial segregation and discrimination in a system that in many ways anticipated apartheid. Most Africans were confined to so-called native territories, which later under South African rule post-1949 were turned into "homelands" (Bantustans). Indeed, some historians have speculated that the German genocide in Namibia was a model used by Nazis in the Holocaust,[14] but most scholars say that episode was not especially influential for the Nazis, who were children at the time[citation needed]. However, the father of Luftwaffe commander Hermann Göring was a one-time German colonial governor of Namibia and has a street named after him in Swakopmund.[15] The memory of genocide remains relevant to ethnic identity in independent Namibia and to relations with Germany.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namibia#German_rule

I remember reading how decades later, the German colonists remained there and kept pictures of Hitler on their walls as a shrine.........

Germans never lived from other people's work
During WW2 the Germans looted almost every part of Europe where they went.... The High Nazis stole national treasuries and looted museums while the low Nazis/German soldiers bought up everything in the stores with the fixed currencies down to the last egg and stick of butter and took it back home to Germany when on leave..... Got so bad that Nazi diplomats complained that it was promoted unrest in the occupied territories and even with "allies" but were overruled but that was how the Nazis were buying social peace at home. When the Western Allies finally reached Germany, they noted how much better fed the people were compared to the occupied nations such as Greece etc......

.


As said, if Germans would have killed all Namibia, would make 1 million dead

French killed millions in Algeria alone

Germans were more effective, they not worst but more Gründlich .. that's the way they are

:lol: that was really funny with German looting

Monster, British Museum & Louvre (and a few others) had to close if it were not for those things Greek and Egyptian and Roman and Persian stuff there

What do the Brits have ? ?

Brits even much worst than made up "Jewish History"

Even Shakespeare invented

come on, Monster, come on

Germans, NAZI, looting this and that, paintings and art ? ? :lol:

Mesopotamian, Baghdad, Museum was first thing to be plundered, even before the Oil ministry (special embarrassing files all disappeared .. CIA special unit)

Special units were trained to loot Baghdad museum immediately in first hour .. a few items, just to fool,were returned, but most gone and will surface later in western museums

Getty Museum all looted stuff .. not a single one legally exited Greece, Egypt, Iran, Italy

Buying those stuff in auction does not mean they legal

All those stuff are property of origin

Greece and Iran want them back



.

Thank you Very Much for your post, Azari.

Gründlich = thorough........... Exactly what you don't want in evil conquerers/Monsters ;) :twisted: :evil:

Better a Monster ;) who is clumsy, drunken, lazy, lecherous, playful, sloppy and especially "schizophrenic"....... You may have a better chance to survive........

The Monster ;) may even sometimes prove to be a flawed "hero"........ As the British and others have been sometimes....... to the Moskitos, to the North American Native Americans, to Africans (slave trade, South Africa etc.......) etc.......

Last thing you want is a thorough monster... Like the Germans.......

May be one reason, Jesus preferred the sinners to the rule keepers...........


Even with a sloppy monster it's bad.......... Andy Jackson's experience with the British........ that STUPID Great Game in Central Asia........

But most of humanity are monsters in potential if not practice... Often from lack of opportunity..."Cromwells guiltless of blood" from lack opportunity & necessity"...

Not that many Bodhisattvas, WWJD Saints like the bureaucrat Chiune Sugihara..........

IIRC the Jews believe there are only 36 Tzaddiks at any one time.... for whose sake G_d does not destroy the World.......

Most if not all of us/uz are at best sinners saved by grace and still subject to temptation......
Still have an sinful undead depraved killer ape nature trying raise itself from the grave to turn us/uz into nasty trolls again.........

But I digress....


The looting of the Museums was a lesser atrocity..... may have shown a comparatively "good" aspect of the German monsters....... they appreciated art........
Better that than iconoclasts.... which have included Christians in the past as well as the Sunni Muslims who are notorious in their hate of figurative art........

Funny story: during the Nazi occupation there was an artist who faked a number of Vermeers and sold them to the Nazis...... After the war, he was prosecuted as a traitor but successfully defended himself against the charge by showing that the works he sold were fakes :shock: ..... IIRC he even painted one in court 8-) :lol:

A sadder aspect is that often it has been "thieves" /archaeologists who have saved and are saving art...... Remembering a book about Troy....... IIRC Schielmann had to sneak a good bit of the loot to Germany as otherwise it would have been melted down for the gold as it was considered to be just junk from "The Days of Ignorance" that is the period before Islam..........worth only its metal value........

Or what you the crafty Muslim can get by selling it piece by piece to the infidels as was done with the Dead Sea Scrolls..........

Another example of this is that right now, the Greek museums are being looted by professional thieves stealing to order for private collectors because the Greek Govt. does not have money to pay the security guards........ Have read that similar or worse happened in Egypt during the "Arab Spring"......... I'm a bit concerned what may happen if the Salafi ride as high in Egypt as they did in Afghanistan...... Bamyan Buddhas....

And sadly, I have read that during or shortly after WW2, much of the ceramic art of Troy was destroyed when stupid German peasants broke into an unguarded warehouse where the artifacts were stored to protect them from bombing to get to get stuff to break for a "polterbend" for a marriage........
For the love of G_d, consider you & I may be mistaken.
Orion Must Rise: Killer Space Rocks Coming Our way
The Best Laid Plans of Men, Monkeys & Pigs Oft Go Awry
Woe to those who long for the Day of the Lord, for It is Darkness, Not Light
Post Reply